Oreal expresses a strong preference for working on tangible features over creating prompts for Claode, citing a belief that Canathropic, the developer, consistently degrades the AI's performance. They assert that this degradation is deliberate, intended to allow Canathropic to later resell a diminished product at an inflated price. Oreal explicitly states that they find creating prompts for Claode to be meaningless due to this perceived continuous worsening of the AI.
The core of their complaint lies in the perceived decline of Claode's capabilities, specifically noting that Claode 2.0 is, in their opinion, superior to the current Claode 4. This comparison highlights a significant regression in the AI's performance as experienced by the user. Oreal implies a lack of transparency from Canathropic regarding these changes and deterioration.
The overall sentiment conveyed is one of frustration and dissatisfaction with the current state of Claode and Canathropic's development practices. Oreal's actions and focus are clearly driven by a desire to engage in valuable work rather than what they consider to be futile efforts with a consistently degrading tool.